Joint Venture Farming Group
Logged in as   Farming for a Profitable Future

Data Highlights

Introduction

Set out below are the benchmark average costs for each operation, some of the performance factors for labour and various machinery categories and the work rates achieved.

Contact Jamie Gwatkin on 01284 701045 or mobile 07976 736393 to discuss your requirements or join the Joint Venture Farming Group and come along to the benchmarking sessions.

Come along and find out how you can lower your costs and take full advantage of the increase in commodity prices.

Key points extracted from the Joint Venture Farming Group full membership data.

JOINT VENTURE FARMING GROUP
GLOBAL BENCHMARKING RESULTS
  2005 Harvest 2006 Harvest 2007 Harvest
Operations Costs £/Ha £/Ha £/Ha
Primary Cultivations 18.75 32.85 27.92
Secondary Cultivations 8.41 19.43 16.34
Drilling 12.71 19.53 19.32
Rolling 4.40 5.63 5.82
Fertiliser Application 5.43 3.65 3.96
Spraying 3.54 3.34 3.18
Harvesting 55.51 54.58 46.84
Carting 8.66 6.65 15.44

Labour Analysis      
Labour Efficiency 69.6% 75.1% 61.8%
Average Costs per hour 10.37 10.57 9.90

 

Machinery Analysis £/Ha £/Ha £/Ha
Combine Harvesters 52.84 42.04 41.45
Crawlers 11.92 13.17 11.85
Sprayers 2.42 1.97 2.65

 

Work Rates Ha/Hr Ha/Hr Ha/Hr
Primary Cultivations 2.65 1.55 2.11
Secondary Cultivations 4.86 2.67 3.44
Drilling 3.33 3.51 2.75
Rolling 8.09 6.07 5.91
Fertiliser Application 12.80 8.42 8.89
Spraying 8.07 10.17 9.55
Harvesting & Carting 2.79 2.45 2.14

 

Benchmarking Summary Commentary

The global benchmark figures are taken as an average of all groups within the survey. When reviewing the results it is important to recognise the following points:

The following points are some general observations from the 2007 survey:

  1. The total operations cost has reduced from £145.66 per hectare to £138.82 per hectare. This is a reduction of 4.70%
  2. Primary and secondary cultivations saw a reduction of 15.3%. This was partly as a result of increased work rates even in a difficult season across some parts of the country. It is also acknowledged that more light land farms were included in the survey, which also contributed to lower cost because of the reduced number of passes.
  3. Drilling costs were broadly static. Although work rates were down, this was compensated for by lower machine costs.
  4. Harvesting and carting costs saw a 1.7% increase. Machine costs were down by £0.59 per hectare but the work rates also reduced by 0.31 hectare per hour.
  5. Labour efficiency fell from 75.1% to 61.8% because of the inclement weather. The average labour cost reduced because of the inclusion of some cheaper casual workers.